Cosmic Oaths as the Legitimation of Revelation: Interpreting Q. al-Wāqi‘ah [56]:75–76 in the Tafsirs of al-Ṭabarī and al-Māturīdī

Authors

  • Dewi Lestari LSIQH Yogyakarta Author

Keywords:

cosmic oaths, legitimation of revelation, Tafsir al-Ṭabarī, Tafsir al-Māturīdī, Q. al-Wāqi‘ah [56]:75–76

Abstract

This study examines cosmic oaths as the legitimation of revelation in Q. al-Wāqi‘ah [56]:75–76 through a comparative analysis of the interpretations of two classical exegetes, al-Ṭabarī and al-Māturīdī. The study is grounded in the methodological differences within the tafsir tradition that shape the interpretation of cosmic oaths in the Qur’an. It aims to identify the similarities and differences between the two exegetes and to explain how their methodological approaches influence their understanding of cosmic oaths as a form of legitimizing revelation. This research employs a qualitative method with a library research approach, using Jāmi‘ al-Bayān by al-Ṭabarī and Ta’wīlāt Ahl al-Sunnah by al-Māturīdī as primary sources, supported by relevant secondary literature. The findings reveal that al-Ṭabarī tends to employ a linguistic and transmission-based (lughawī-riwāyah) approach, emphasizing linguistic meaning and transmitted reports, thereby understanding cosmic oaths as a literal affirmation of the grandeur of the Qur’an. In contrast, al-Māturīdī adopts a rational-theological approach that expands the meaning of cosmic oaths as an argumentative strategy responding to the rejection of revelation. Thus, the methodological differences between the two exegetes directly shape their interpretations of cosmic oaths as the legitimation of revelation in the Qur’an.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alamsyah, J., Jamaan, A., & Saifudin, I. (2025). Enhancing maritime vocational education: Balancing studies and sustainability integration in transportation management. DIAJAR: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 275–282.

al-Ṭabarī, Jāmi‘ al-Bayān; al-Māturīdī, Ta’wīlāt Ahl al-Sunnah. Nurul Huda ( 2022 ) . “Kaidah Dan Faidah Al-Qasam (Sumpah) Dalam Al-Qur’an”. Jurnal Aksioma Al- Asas: Jumal Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dum, Vol 3, No. 1, 2022.

Suhaimi ( 2021 ) .“Sumpah dalam Al-Qur’an” JURNAL ILMIAH AL MUASHIRAH: Media Kajian Al-Qur’an dan Al-Hadis Multi Perspektif , Vol. 18, No. 1, Januari 2021, Hal: 71-82

Jailanı, Ani, dan Hasbiyallah Hasbiyallah. (2019). “Kajian Amtsal Dan Qasam Dalam Al Qur'an". Islamika: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 19 (02):16-26.

Hadijah, S. (2020). Ayat-ayat Qasam Allah SWT dalam Juz ‘Amma menurut Tafsir Al- Maraghi. Al Karima: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al Quran Dan Tafsir, 2 (2), 44-55.

Junizar Satman (2016). “Pendekatan Penanfisran Al-Qur’an Yang Didasarkan Pada Instrumen Riwayat. Nalar. Dan Isyarat Batın. Intizar 20. Tidak. I (23 Maret 2016): 43-

62. Diakses 24 Desember 2025.

Ali Hamdan (2013) Tinjauan Historis dan Metodologis.Ulul Albab Jurnal Studi Islam. Vol 14, No 2 (2013) .

( Walid A. Saleh : 2004 ) The Formation of the Classical Tafsir Tradition, hlm. 117– 125).

( Walid A. Saleh : 2006 ) “Early Sunni Exegesis, Mu‘tazilism…”, hlm. 30–38)

Shaleh, W. A. (2016). Journal Ofs Qur’anic Studies. Rereading al-Thabari Through al- Maturidi: New Light on The Third Century Hijri. Vol, 18. No, 2. 2016. Hal 180-209. Shohibul Adib,M Syihabuddin Muin,Fahmi Arif El Muniry, Ulumul

Qur’an Ptrofil Para Mufassir Al-Qur’an dan Para Pengkajinya. (Banten: Pustaka Dunia, 2011), h. 1

Mahmud, Mani’ Abd H.im, Metodologi Tafsir Kajian Komprehensif Metode Para Ahli Tafsir. (Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2006) h. 67

Muhammad Husean ad-Dzahabi, at-Tafsi>r wa al-Mufassirun, vol. I (Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1995) h. 215.

Adistia, Yusril, Nur Baitul Izzah, Nikmah, Muhammad afif ( 2019), Telaah Kitab Tafsir Ath-thabari Dalam Q.s Al-maidah Ayat 51, al-Munir: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir , Volume 1, Number 2, Desember 2019: 55 – 78.

Al-Tabari. Jami‘ Al-bayan Fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an, h. 46.

Abdul Djalal, Ulumul Qur’an, (Surabaya: Dunia Ilmu, 2002) h. 31. H. Abdul Djalal, Ulumul Qur’an. Surabaya: Dunia Ilmu, 2002.

Mohammad Aly Ash Shabuny Pengantar study Al-Qur’an : bandung, Pt al ma’rif 1996 h. 258.

Muhammad Tholhah Hasan, Ahlusunnah Wal-Jamaah dalam persepsi dan tradisi NU, (Jakarta; lantabora Pers, 2005), hlm. 24

Al-Nasyar, Al-Syammi, A. Ali, Nasy’ahnal-Fikr al-Falsafi fi al-Islam, I, Dar al-Fikr, al- Arabi Mesir, 1397, hlm. 216.

Noer Iskandar Al-Barsany, Pemikiran Kalam Imam Abu Mansur Al-Maturidi (Perbandingan dengan kalam Mu’tazilah dan Al-Asy’ari), (Jakarta; PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001), hlm. 10

Aditya ( 2012). Skripsi , Pemikiran Kalam Abu Mansur al-Maturidi Tentang Syafaat Rasul. Jurusan Akidah Filsafat, fakutas ushuluddin uin sultan syarif kasim riau. 2012. Drs. Mudzakir AS. ( 2016 ) Manna Khalil Al – Qattan, STUDI ILMU -ILMU QUR’AN, Penerbit: Litera Antar Nusa. hlm. 45-46.

Adilah, Hasna (2025). Analisis Stilistika Gaya Sumpah Sebagai Fenomena Linguistik dalam Surah Asy-Syams. Jurnal Center of Middlw Eastern Studies, Volume 18, Number 2, hal 1-13, 2025

Khairuni, Nisa. (2024). Jurnal Studi Islam. Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan dalam Kitab Tafsir Al-Thabari (Analisis Kritik Corak dan Logika Pemikirannya). Vol. 1, No. 2. Maret-Juni 2024. Hal 149-165.

Kartika, Dini. Hasanah, Uswatun. (2025). Jurnal Teologi Islam. Hadits dan Tafsir Bi al- Ma’tsur: Tela’ah Tafsir al-Thabari. Vol. 1, No, 2. 2025. Hal 516-525.

Ridwan, A. R., Shyafitri, M. S., Anggraini, R., Saputra, I. (2024). Jurnal Studi Islam Indonesia. Klarifikasi Tafir Berdasarkan Metode Muqaran. (2024). Vol. 2, No. 2. Desember 2024. Hal 245-256.

Husna, Nihayatul. (2025). Jurnal Kajian Al-Qur’an dan Hadis. Aqsam Al-Qur’an dan Tradisi Sumpah Masyarakat Jahiliyah: Adaptasi Retorika Ilahi. (2025). Vol. 5, No. 2. Desember 2025. Hal 203-215.

Abu Bakar, Ali. (2023). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh. Integrasi Tradisi dan Penafsiran Al-Qur’an Serta Perubahan Hukum: Kajian Sosiologi Hukum. Vol. 4, No. 1. Hal 162-181.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Cosmic Oaths as the Legitimation of Revelation: Interpreting Q. al-Wāqi‘ah [56]:75–76 in the Tafsirs of al-Ṭabarī and al-Māturīdī. (2026). Jurnal Studi Tafsir, 1(1), 53-82. https://jurnal.contradixie.id/index.php/jst/article/view/4